Vergleich titanic queen mary 2
8. Jan. Die Concorde schaffte die Atlantiküberquerung in drei Stunden. Mit der "Queen Mary 2" wurde nun ein Kreuzfahrt-Titan getauft, der die gleiche. Okt. Eine Woche an Bord der legendären "Queen Mary 2", der größte und Klar, der Mythos "Titanic", die auf dem Weg von Southampton nach. Juni Als das wohl berühmteste Schiff der Welt, die RMS Titanic, am 10, Queen Mary 2, Cunard Line, , , Im Vergleich: Die aktuelle Mein Schiff 1 ist etwa 50 Meter kürzer und kann bis zu Passagiere.
Structured data Captions English Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents. Description En mary titanic. En mary titanic ar.
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:. You may select the license of your choice.
The following 4 pages uses this file: The following other wikis use this file: Width Height Retrieved from " https: Derivative versions SVG created with Inkscape: Views View Edit History.
Titanic will remain an unsinkable ship in our memory, respect to others ship already forgotten. What you say cannot be proposed because Titanic with her dimensions cannot challenge the QM2.
If we had a perfect copy of Titanic, it beside QM2, appeared very inferior in dimension and very much less imposing. You are in right wheno you say that "battle" is not the appropriate word for my article.
But I choised "battle" in order to do more winning the article. Thanks very much for your segnalation about that very interesting site. Gaetano Anania , Aug 24, It was nearly ft long QM2 is 1, ft right?
Titanic with her mast is just as tall as QM2 as well. Someone please back me up on this for the support of our beloved Titanic!
Anyway its a futile battle, QM2 holds the title for now, but for how long? Voyager of the Seas only had it for so long too.
We have to remember that in all its not the size of the vessel, but its accomplishments and history and beauty, which Titanic had many of each. Also at what point to you stop calling a ship a ship?
QM2 is a ship, but is an oil tanker? Montgomery , Aug 25, By any reckoning, the QM2 is three times as massive. Colin, your quite right that the Titanic was no dighy, and she would be a large vessel even todays standards, but by the same token, her glories are way overrated.
While very comfortable by Edwardian standards and expectations, she would be considered sadly deficient in many respects, and even then, the Germans were building ships which would beat her in terms of size.
And yes, a tanker is most certainly a ship. Standart , Aug 25, Hi Colin, I respect your point of view, but I disagree with it.
In fact you care only about lenght, forgetting the others dimensions. Obviously we have not to forget another important feature: A ship is a structure of complex engineering developed in three dimensions, not only in lenght.
If there was a raft long mt like QM2 or more than QM2, this would not mean that the raft is imposing like QM2 or more than it, because the raft would not have height, and only a little weight.
And obviously the tonnage. Gaetano Anania , Aug 26, Sorry for my mistakes in english! In my precedent post I confused! I wrote "weight", unlike I understand "width".
Plus remember that size is not everything after all T-Rex is the most famous dinosaur of all time, not the spinosaurus. Jamie Bryant , Aug 30, Yes, as you, I think that also if in future ships ever bigger will build, the legend and the celebrity of Titanic will remain insuperable!
This is a mathematical certainty! Gaetano Anania , Aug 30, Well, maybe, but that would depend on the nature and extent of the damage. Larger ships tend to be far more resistant to sinking then smaller ones do if only because there all that much more hull volumn that needs to be flooded befor the thing rolls over or tips up and goes under.
For all her size, the Lusitania sank in 18 minutes after being hit by a single torpedo, and quite rapidly whereas the smaller Carpathia took three torpedoes and two and a half hours to sink.
There are a lot of variables at work in a shipping casualty. Standart , Aug 30, Hi everybody I am in school right now.
Help me out here. How would the weight of a a ship work against it? Montgomery , Aug 31, When the bending loads imposed on an already weakened hull exceed the ability of the structure to support that extra mass, it breaks.
Standart , Aug 31, The sinking of a ship is something of very relative. Each sinking has a different dynamic from another one.
Overall damages influence a sinking with their substantial seriousness and their distribution along the hull. A great example is obviously the Titanic.
Its designers could not imagine, or they considered impossible that kind of situation toward which Titanic went. So the hull was broken in two parts for that sort of inclination because, like you obviously know, it was not projected for that pressure.
Obviously this is depends by situation. Gaetano Anania , Sep 1, You could be four miles long and not be impressive. Titanic was tall and wide too.
Montgomery , Sep 3, However, for revenue and taxation purposes, what matters is the net tonnage which is a measure of the ships money making capacity.
Standart , Sep 4, A lot of people think LOA is cheating. Is the last bits of a ship not part of the vessel?
Montgomery , Sep 19, I see it as a triumph. I think the real answer is much simpler: While the parts you mentioned certainly are parts of the vessel overall, from the standpoint of actual displacement Standart , Sep 21, Oh of course usually it is due to human error.
It was only in the small possiblility of it happening. It did not need those features to be a seaworthy craft. Montgomery , Sep 21, You must log in or sign up to reply here.
Your name or email address: Do you already have an account? No, create an account now.Die mögliche Maximal-Auslastung eines Schiffs ist manchmal nämlich nicht offiziell bekannt, sodass wir hier teils auf Werte aus nicht absolut verifizierbaren Quellen zurückgreifen mussten. Auch die Band stellt keine Ansprüche an den Staat. Der Termin wird aber wohl nicht gehalten werden. Hamburger Umweltbehörde empört Kleingärtner mit Fragebogen Kommentare 1. Mein 6 jähriges Patenkind interessiert sich sehr für Kreuzfahrtschiffe. Ernüchternde Erkenntnisse vom Weltwirtschaftsforum: In der folgenden Tabelle sind zusätzliche die derzeit bekannten, geplanten Neubauten der kommenden Jahre berücksichtigt Namen bzw. Sovereign Sovereign of the Seas, heute: Opfer des spanischen Dürre-Dramas: Ansonsten muss man halt sagen: Helfen Sie mit und werden Sie selbst zum Tourismusforscher. Was sagt ihr, soll ich ihm melden oder eher es so laufen lassen, da es mir ja nicht direkt angeht?